Comments on: Special Privilege for Religious Values http://twentysixh.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/special-privilege-for-religious-values/ I Might Be Wrong Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:12:44 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Ed http://twentysixh.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/special-privilege-for-religious-values/#comment-621 Ed Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:05:49 +0000 http://twentysixh.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/special-privilege-for-religious-values/#comment-621 You do that. It is a “cherished belief” after all. Oh, how warm and fuzzy. Thanks for the encouragement! You do that. It is a “cherished belief” after all. Oh, how warm and fuzzy. Thanks for the encouragement!

]]> By: Toby http://twentysixh.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/special-privilege-for-religious-values/#comment-620 Toby Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:04:15 +0000 http://twentysixh.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/special-privilege-for-religious-values/#comment-620 With so many omnipotent gods its a wonder that we dont all believe in some sort of religion. It must be gods will. He/they have deliberately moulded some unbelievers and some gays to spice it up a bit. Nice work, I have put it in my "special priviledge" box so I no longer have to question it. With so many omnipotent gods its a wonder that we dont all believe in some sort of religion. It must be gods will. He/they have deliberately moulded some unbelievers and some gays to spice it up a bit.

Nice work, I have put it in my “special priviledge” box so I no longer have to question it.

]]> By: Ed http://twentysixh.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/special-privilege-for-religious-values/#comment-619 Ed Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:04:13 +0000 http://twentysixh.wordpress.com/2007/02/26/special-privilege-for-religious-values/#comment-619 In retrospect I almost certainly gave Slee far too much credit for his comparison of Dawkins with murderous fundamentalists. It’s plain the reason he specifically chose bloodthirsty fanatics, as opposed to merely, say, “the most dogmatic of theists” or something like that was because he wanted to imply some kind of moral equivalence or guilt by association. Perfidious stuff. In retrospect I almost certainly gave Slee far too much credit for his comparison of Dawkins with murderous fundamentalists. It’s plain the reason he specifically chose bloodthirsty fanatics, as opposed to merely, say, “the most dogmatic of theists” or something like that was because he wanted to imply some kind of moral equivalence or guilt by association. Perfidious stuff.

]]>